Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
黎已還押逾5年，其餘8人則還押逾4年。今次是香港首宗「勾結罪」案件判刑，案件於2023年12月開審，審訊歷時156日，由三名國安法指定法官審理。
，推荐阅读搜狗输入法下载获取更多信息
ExtrudeGeometry（挤压几何体）：，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
4급 ‘마스가 과장’, 단숨에 2급 국장 파격 직행…“李대통령 OK”
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08